|
1 sept 2004 REFLECTIONS OF AN OLD
SOLDIER
Old FRIENDS, at the head table and where ever you are seated,
General Boutelle, ladies and gentlemen:
Before making a few remarks tonight, I want to thank EmmEtt
Paige for his work to create the 1st Signal Brigade
Association. This Association is already off to a good start. It can:
a. preserve the history of a unique Signal organization,
b. provide a bond between the people who made it great, and
c. record the accomplishments that, in the pages of history,
will speak for themselves.
I also want to thank Roy Busdiecker and Merv Norton who, have
worked together to create a fine web SITE FOR the Signal Brigade. This can
be an effective instrument for the Association and a suitable reference
for the Army Historical Center at Carlisle.
We are greatly indebted to the three of them for the
leadership and work that led to this Reunion. I think that they deserve a
standing ovation.
In July after being invited to speak tonight, my mind wandered
back through many memories, then turned to the present. Our Army, fully
deployed and perhaps overextended, fights the war on TERRORISM WHOSE
outcome will define our future. General BOUTELLE MUST have this fight
constantly in his mind.
The costs of war permeate the budget and the wounded quietly
recover in the Wards of Walter Reed. We have not yet seen the devastation
and human losses that the Civil War, World War I and World War II
produced. Perhaps they may come. War is a very uncertain thing.
The Press in many cases distorts the news from areas of combat
and makes difficult the analysis by the general reader that could provide
a clear understanding of the issues, goals and progress. Letters from
soldiers and junior officers that I have read indicate that they
understand the importance of this war, believe that they are succeeding,
and have confidence in their leaders. Once again the individual soldier in
our Army has met the call of duty and humbled each of us in respect for
the sacrifices made.
Concurrently, we are in the midst of a heated, political
campaign. The overblown rhetoric and partisan views are as old as the
Republic itself. Here tonight, I expect there are those who support each
of the major parties. One development, which is not new, showcases senior
officers supporting one candidate or another. In my view at least, this
practice tends to politicize the Officer Corps. Many polls continue to
indicate that the public respects the integrity of our Officer Corps to a
very high degree. We cannot afford to lose that respect and with it the
trust of the American People. General George C. Marshall set the example.
The Officer Corps swears to uphold the Constitution. That is it; nothing
less and nothing more.
Am I saying we should not vote? No, we certainly have the
right and the obligation of every citizen to vote. You may say General
Marshall refrained from voting. his biographer states that. this was a
practice carried over from the Old Army of the early part of the Century.
He was certainly effective dealing with Congressional Delegations of both
parties and he took no actions that politicized the Army whether on active
duty or after HE RETIRED.
In the midst of these major developments, we are all old
soldiers gathered together in Reunion. We have heard our share of
inspirational speeches, marched up many gangplanks and on to many
aircraft, thrived on K or C rations, then shared a bottle of Jack Daniels,
checked our soldiers, cleaned our weapons and snatched time to write a
quick letter home... Does that sound familiar?
Tonight, let’s focus on the past. Can you think of a better
time to tell a few war stories? I plan to tell a few. I will focus on
the Signal Brigade, perhaps not as you knew it, but certainly as I knew
it. Maybe afterwards, you will have some of your own stories you will want
to share. Fortunately there are enough of us here, that all of our stories
are apt to have witnesses present. That should keep us all reasonably
honest.
Thirty eight years ago, we were building up our Forces to
preserve South Viet Nam and defeat the North Vietnamese effort to take
over the country. Without rehashing those troubled years, you all know the
results, the United States withdrew and North Viet Nam took over. Our
Military Forces met the challenge; our civilian leadership and the
Congress did not.
Many books have been written about that period from almost
every viewpoint. General Bruce Palmer’s book, The 25-Year War, America’s
Military Role in Viet Nam, I found excellent, comprehensive and balanced.
Colonel John Bergen’s book, Military Communications, A Test for
Technology, published by the Army Center for Military History treats the
Signal Brigade and the overall Electronic Battlefield in a comprehensive,
integrated and detailed manner. John Bergen did a fine job. I hope that he
is here tonight.
Let’s go back to 1965. After deploying to the Dominican
Republic with the XVIIIth Airborne Corp as the Corps Signal Officer, and a
brief tour of a few months as Chief of Staff at Fort Monmouth, I received
orders to go to Viet Nam. The Army Staff, DCA and STRATCOM provided
briefings. I flew to Viet Nam in early January 1966 with the mission to
establish a Signal Brigade and to take command of it. Some of you here
tonight remember those days.
At that time all three services had communication troops
deployed there doing their individual missions. Some of you will recall
that COMUSMACV, in October 1965, sent a Memo to the Army Chief of Staff
pointing out the disorganized nature of the communication situation and
making recommendations. As a result, the JCS sent General Starbird, as
head of the DCA to survey the situation and recommend what should be done.
At the same time The Army Chief of Staff sent a team headed by Major
General J.C.F. Tillson TO REVIEW internal Army communication organizations
in Viet Nam. Based on General Starbird’s recommendations the JCS directed
the Army to put in place a Theater System to serve all services and the
DCA to create an expanded Control Center. Navy and Air Force
communications unique to their missions were kept in place. As a result of
General Tillson’s Report, the Chief of Staff directed the organization of
what became the 1st Signal Brigade.
Before continuing, let me digress for a moment. The build up
in Viet Nam started in the early 60’s. Various elements of the Signal
Corps, responding to Theater requirements, had planned diligently for
major communication systems that would be needed. The Integrated Wideband
Communication System was under construction, Thailand and Viet Nam were
connected by a Tropospheric Scatter Link. There were other major projects
completed or underway. I entered the picture in the midst of a buildup in
communications already started by some of you in this room...
When I arrived In January of 1966, the Army had the 69th
Signal Bn spread all over Viet Nam providing Tactical Communications and
elements of the 2nd Signal Group, 11th Signal Group
and 39th Signal Battalion deployed to handle the Strategic
Communications. The major relay station at Phu Lam was in place and
functioning. Bob Myer commanded the 69th. I never saw our
Signal Troops spread more thinly and still get the job done. He did an
outstanding job then and he only got better as more stars came his
way.
the whole communications picture was fragmented and had to be
put into some kind of focus. The task of forming a Signal Brigade had to
get started. I saw no suitable officers to pull into the process without
hurting our efforts to provide communications. Then, I saw orders for the
Executive Officer of the 50th Airborne Signal Bn to come into
Theater. He was ordered to MACV. I saw General Lotz, the macv j-6, MADE MY
case and got then Major Bodman diverted to join me in the effort to create
the Brigade. Later we were joined by others. Bodman and I had worked
together in the XVIIIth Airborne Corps and in the Dom Rep. We made a good
team and the job got done. After 6 months of the most intensive kind of
staff work, and the Brigade well started, I arranged for Major Bodman to
go to the 1st Cav Div as Assistant Division Signal Officer. He
had been indispensable.
During this period many key issues arose. Progress
with the IWCS seemed slow and the then, Civilian General Manager for Page
Communications seemed not up to the task. We needed badly the IWCS to
provide the circuits to control combat activities in a timely manner. The
Air Force depended on FRAG Orders. Something had to be done. Merv Norton
formed a Project Office in the Brigade. Emmitt Paige drove the Project in
Electronics Command. I stepped in. Shortly thereafter, Doug Carter arrived
to become General Manager and progress accelerated. People are key to
getting things done..
Talking about the IWCS, many of you remember the sites
associated with that system. One of many worries that occupied our minds
from the date I ARRIVED WAS the possibility that the NVA or VC would
understand their importance and take them out. Pr’line up near Dalat
provides a classic example but it was not the only one. It was carefully
fortified and dug in. An ARVN rifle company was deployed on site as local
security. Supporting artillery fires were preplanned to provide additional
assistance in case of attack. But, it was vulnerable. The first time i
visited Dalat I slept over night in the local Hotel. It was very
comfortable but I slept little with my pistol near my hand. About 6 months
later, we had 8 civilian employees and one soldier from the 362nd
Signal Company killed in an ambush on the road between Pr’line and Dalat.
Two soldiers were decorated for their efforts to defend the convoy.
Security being a real priority, early on General Palmer assigned an
Infantry Lt. Col. that I made the Brigade Security Officer to ensure we
had the best defense arrangements possible at these isolated sites. It
appears that these early preparations paid off at the time of the Tet
Offensive.
Being old soldiers you all are well aware of the kinds of
problems that had to be overcome. STRATCOM, under General Meyer had been
given the mission for Strategic Communications and, like any good soldier;
he was determined to carry it out. On the other hand US Army Viet Nam had
a war to fight and General Engler as General Westmoreland Deputy, and
charged with supporting the combat effort intended to do just that. A host
of issues were overcome. Backchannel messages worked very well in those
days. We finally came to an issue that had been a back burner issue for
some time and that repeated discussions with both Commanders failed to
resolve. General Meyer insisted that the Brigade wear the StRATCOM patch
and General Engler and General Norton insisted it wear the USARV patch. A
War Department Team came to USARV to resolve a large number of unit
designation issues and as they closed out their meetings, the team chief
came to see me and we talked the situation over. Between us we worked out
the design that the Brigade wears today. He agreed to approve it for DA
and I approved it for USARV/ STRATCOM. Neither of the Commanders ever
discussed the decision with me after that and the issue was resolved. You
know you always run the chance of getting fired with those type decisions.
All of you know that the best results follow when a commander
involves himself in the details of unit activities. The Signal Brigade was
no exception. Early on I determined that I had to know how well we were
performing our communications role. Fortunately Major Gust arrived and
shared this goal. We built a Command Communications Control Center next to
DCA and Walt Gust worked every day to measure circuit and network
performance. He developed charts to show trends and these helped pin point
problems. The results gave us a quantitative basis for taking action.
Once again, the job got done because of a good man, with initiative,
unfettered by needless guidance.
At about the same time I organized an early morning daily
briefing by Operations. Gene Renzi will remember these sessions. The
additional requirement that I imposed was to have Group Commanders
available at the same time at their own Operations Centers. by a quick
phone CALL any problem that appeared could be addressed promptly with the
commander concerned. Only later did I find out that this set in motion a
chain of briefings by Commanders of Battalions and smaller units for the
same purpose. The technique proved effective.
Do Those of YOU WHO WERE IN viet nam in 1966 REMEMBER the
difficulties of telephone communication in SAIGON? Nothing we were able
to do seemed to make the system work better. In addition to problems with
the switching system, the cable system absorbed water like a sponge.
I had been exec of the XXII Corps signal Battalion in Germany
in early 1945. We made good use of the installed telephone system, most of
which was underground and in good shape. Saigon and Viet Nam presented an
entirely different problem.
Finally we hit upon the idea of creating a Telephone
Management Agency. To staff it, we went after graduates from the AT&T
Course that the Army Signal Corps had been using to train Signal Officers
in Fixed Plant Communications for a long time. Col Van Sandt, at DCSPER,
helped greatly and soon we had a team that had the right background that
could get the job done. The switching and the cable system both demanded
attention. Work started on a new automatic switch. THE CABLE system needs
strained army resources. cable repairmen were in short supply. some one
had decided we wouldn’t need many. Cable repair parts would be ordered,
SHIPPED, and disappear into the log command depot. again and again a
special order through pacfo on okinawa followed by direct shipment, kept
us going. Once again, faced with difficult problems, getting the right
person, giving him full responsibility, and letting him go at it, worked.
The situation got better. That was a fine day when we cut over the new
Automatic Switchboard.
Another issue that required special attention was technical
training. Soldiers arrived poorly trained for the equipment we expected
them to operate. DA had said that no training schools would be established
in Theater. None the less we had to do something, so we set up special
classes that proved successful then added more classes. Eventually we had
a very much needed school supporting Theater needs. Some of you may also
remember that during WWII in AFWESPAC we also had a Theater Signal School.
First, it trained our own soldiers; then, as demobilization thinned US
units we trained Philippine soldiers and civilian employees to replace our
departing soldiers. It proved to be very effective there also.
Even in those early buildup days, we could see the need to get
ARVN Signal Units better trained so that they could meet their own needs.
We paired US and ARVN Signal Units and encouraged them to work together. I
am not sure how successful this effort turned out. There was certainly a
wide gap in training and capabilities at that time. I am aware however
that our Group and Battalion Commanders made a continuing effort to help
these units.
During this early period, we received fine support from the
Army Staff, the Electronics Command, USARV and STRATCOM. I want to
emphasize, the progress that was made and the success achieved depended on
many people in all those organizations. Lt. Col Van Sandt, whom I
mentioned earlier, in DCSPER, could be counted on to provide the right
people to meet our key needs. Emmitt Paige at Electronics Command could
always be counted on. We could turn to pockets of Signal Corps expertise
imbedded in the new Organization of the Army to produce results.
The Army had reorganized but the Commanders in the field
sometimes turned to the old channels to get things done. When General
DePuy, at the 1st Infantry Division, fired his Signal Officer
he didn’t consult me. But when he needed a new one he did. My phone rang.
I found him Jim Rockwell. Rocky turned out fine and went on to wear three
stars. Of course there is a sequel to this story. A few months after
Rockwell had been at the 1st Division, the phone rang. Rocky
was calling. Gen DePuy wanted new Command Consoles for his Command Group
Hueys, and he wanted them now. Rocky’s message was, you put me here; now
help me out. Fortunately, there was some one that could help and did.
Rocky’s job was safe.
Those are all the stories I plan to tell. But, before I close,
I want to salute the women who held our families together, who kept our
kids on the right path, who struggled with finances, and who coped with
emergencies --- while we were at war with the 1st Signal
Brigade. No medals came their way to recognize their efforts, but I would
like to say THANK YOU ----- a heartfelt thank you.
You old soldiers here tonight served in the Signal Brigade at
many different times and under many different circumstances. You have your
own war stories and I hope you will share some of them later. It will come
as no secret that as I stand here on my 84th birthday, I am
immensely proud of the 1st Signal Brigade and the officers and soldiers
who served with it.
May God bless you all --- Good night.
|